Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Prioritas Implementasi Pendidikan Inklusif Menggunakan Integrasi Metode Entropy-WASPAS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55382/jurnalpustakarobotsister.v4i2.2265Keywords:
Pendidikan Inklusif, Disabilitas, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan, Entropy, WASPASAbstract
Pendidikan inklusif memerlukan prioritas implementasi yang jelas karena sekolah dan pemangku kebijakan sering menghadapi keterbatasan sumber daya, kapasitas guru, infrastruktur, teknologi bantu, dan dukungan kelembagaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan model sistem pendukung keputusan untuk menentukan prioritas strategi pendidikan inklusif bagi peserta didik penyandang disabilitas menggunakan integrasi metode Entropy dan Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS). Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif berbasis Multi-Criteria Decision Making dengan mengevaluasi delapan alternatif strategi berdasarkan sepuluh kriteria. Data diperoleh dari penilaian tiga pakar dan diagregasi menjadi matriks keputusan. Metode Entropy digunakan untuk menghasilkan bobot objektif berdasarkan keragaman data, sedangkan WASPAS digunakan untuk menentukan peringkat alternatif melalui kombinasi Weighted Sum Model dan Weighted Product Model. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada formulasi model prioritisasi pendidikan inklusif yang mengintegrasikan pembobotan objektif, pemeringkatan multikriteria, dan pengujian kestabilan hasil dalam satu kerangka pengambilan keputusan. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa risiko implementasi memperoleh bobot tertinggi sebesar 0,3110, diikuti biaya implementasi sebesar 0,3055. Strategi penguatan kolaborasi antara sekolah, orang tua, dan komunitas disabilitas menjadi prioritas utama dengan nilai sebesar 0,9693, diikuti pelatihan guru sebesar 0,9125, adaptasi kurikulum dan asesmen sebesar 0,8494, serta peningkatan sistem identifikasi kebutuhan peserta didik sebesar 0,8043. Analisis sensitivitas pada nilai ? 0,00–1,00 menghasilkan urutan peringkat yang identik tanpa rank reversal, sehingga model stabil dan robust terhadap perubahan proporsi WSM dan WPM. Kontribusi ilmiah penelitian ini berupa model komputasional yang objektif, transparan, dan dapat direplikasi sebagai dasar pengembangan aplikasi sistem pendukung keputusan pendidikan inklusif.
Downloads
References
M. J. Jardinez and L. R. Natividad, “The The Advantages and Challenges of Inclusive Education: Striving for Equity in the Classroom,” Shanlax International Journal of Education, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 57–65, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.34293/education.v12i2.7182.
S. Singh, “Inclusive Education: Promoting Equity and Access for Students with Disabilities,” Global International Research Thoughts, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 30–35, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.36676/girt.v12.i1.109.
Maspuroh, Ramdan Nafilah, M. Azhar Busaeri Putra, and Fredy Ismail, “The Foundation, Role, Direction of Education in Indonesia, Along with Responsibilities, Authorities and What Educators Must Do,” Responsive: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 185–192, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.61166/responsive.v1i2.21.
A. Kartiko, M. Arif, M. Rokhman, M. A. Ma’arif, and A. Aprilianto, “Legal Review of Inclusive Education Policy: A Systematic Literature Review 2015-2025,” International Journal of Law and Society (IJLS), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 22–46, May 2025, doi: 10.59683/ijls.v4i1.152.
S. A. Dewi, A. Uwiyono, and R. Saleh, “A Juridical Study of Constitutional Court Decision No. 58/PUU-VIII/2010 on the Right to Education and Non-Discrimination in Indonesia,” The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights, vol. 4, no. 01, pp. 43–51, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.58812/eslhr.v4i01.781.
H. Alharbi and S. Iqtadar, “‘I never feel like I am prepared enough’: Teachers’ self?efficacy, challenges and experiences teaching students with disabilities,” Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 758–770, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1111/1471-3802.12666.
Y. Yuliana and S. Sukinah, “Enhancing Learning Engagement of Students with Special Needs through Inclusive Classroom Management Strategies,” Journal of Innovation and Research in Primary Education, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 2130–2141, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.56916/jirpe.v4i4.2042.
C. Yang, T. Wang, and Q. Xiu, “Towards a Sustainable Future in Education: A Systematic Review and Framework for Inclusive Education,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 9, p. 3837, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17093837.
F. Barbara et al., “Interactive Internet Framework Proposal of WASPAS Method: A Computational Contribution for Decision-Making Analysis,” Mathematics, vol. 11, no. 15, p. 3375, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3390/math11153375.
Y. ?ahin and A. Kulakli, “Evaluation of Open and Distance Education Websites: A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach,” Systems, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 58, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/systems11020058.
A. Idaman and T. M. R. Gunung, “Analysis of COPRAS and ORESTE in Determining Superior Website Pages of Universities in Medan City,” Jurnal Informasi dan Teknologi (JIdT), 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.60083/jidt.v6i3.589.
K. Filippou, E. O. Acquah, and A. Bengs, “Inclusive policies and practices in higher education: A systematic literature review,” Review of Education, vol. 13, no. 1, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1002/rev3.70034.
X. Sun, B. Yu, and R. Li, “Designing an innovative Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) framework for optimized teaching and delivery of physical education curriculum,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 29598, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14283-7.
O. A. Ajani and S. Ntombela, “Advancing Inclusive Education in Higher Education:Challenges and Opportunities in Preparing Pre-ServiceTeachers to Support Students with Disabilities,” International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, vol. 14, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.53615/2232-5697.14.25-41.
T. Korthals Altes, M. Willemse, S. L. Goei, and M. Ehren, “Higher education teachers’ understandings of and challenges for inclusion and inclusive learning environments: A systematic literature review,” Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 43, p. 100605, May 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100605.
C. Lucena-Rodríguez, A. I. Invernón-Gómez, J. M. Ortiz-Marcos, and J. Sánchez-Mendías, “Preparing Future Teachers for Inclusive Practices and Disability: A Systematic Literature Review,” International Journal of Instruction, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 59–78, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.29333/iji.2025.1834a.
R. Ramadani, R. Fadillah, and I. N. Fitriyani, “Selection of Head of Study Program using Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) method,” Internet of Things and Artificial Intelligence Journal, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 481–491, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.31763/iota.v4i3.803.
V. Jayakumar, M. Pethaperumal, R. S., and J. Kannan, “Integrating pythagorean fuzzy soft sets with SWARA and WASPAS for enhanced MCDM in education 5.0,” Engineering review, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 29–51, 2025, doi: 10.30765/er.2582.
Ö. Arslan and S. Cebi, “A novel approach for multi-criteria decision making: Extending the WASPAS method using decomposed fuzzy sets,” Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 196, p. 110461, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2024.110461.
A. Muis, A. Idaman, H. Eldo, A. Prabowo, and R. R. Hadistio, “Analisis Metode WASPAS dalam Menentukan Pengangkatan Pegawai Kontrak Menjadi Pegawai Tetap,” SATESI: Jurnal Sains Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 92–99, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.54259/satesi.v4i1.3034.
C.-N. Wang, N.-A.-T. Nguyen, and T.-T. Dang, “Sustainable Evaluation of Major Third-Party Logistics Providers: A Framework of an MCDM-Based Entropy Objective Weighting Method,” Mathematics, vol. 11, no. 19, p. 4203, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.3390/math11194203.
A. Erbey, Ü. Fidan, and C. Gündüz, “A Robust Hybrid Weighting Scheme Based on IQRBOW and Entropy for MCDM: Stability and Advantage Criteria in the VIKOR Framework,” Entropy, vol. 27, no. 8, p. 867, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.3390/e27080867.
N. T. D. Linh, N. H. Son, and D. X. Thao, “Evaluating the Impact of Weighting Methods on the Stability of Scores for Alternatives in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problems,” Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 19998–20004, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.48084/etasr.9518.
T. Van Dua, D. Van Duc, N. C. Bao, and D. D. Trung, “Integration of objective weighting methods for criteria and MCDM methods: application in material selection,” EUREKA: Physics and Engineering, no. 2, pp. 131–148, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.21303/2461-4262.2024.003171.
A. Garcia-Melgar, N. Hyett, K. Bagley, C. McKinstry, J. Spong, and T. Iacono, “Collaborative team approaches to supporting inclusion of children with disability in mainstream schools: A co-design study,” Res. Dev. Disabil., vol. 126, p. 104233, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104233.
S. Schnepel, S. Luger, M. Wehren-Müller, and E. Moser Opitz, “The role of teacher attitudes and collaboration for inclusive teaching practices,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 168, p. 105240, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2025.105240.
R. G. Ledwaba and M. M. Sefotho, “Curriculum adaptation for learners with diverse learning needs: A case of South African inclusive rural schools,” S. Afr. J. Educ., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 1–8, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.15700/saje.v44n4a2510.
Y. I. Normawati and L. A. Cahyani, “Identification and Assessment of Children with Intellectual Disability in Inclusive School”.
F. Barbara et al., “Interactive Internet Framework Proposal of WASPAS Method: A Computational Contribution for Decision-Making Analysis,” Mathematics, vol. 11, no. 15, p. 3375, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3390/math11153375.
A. Mahmoudian Azar Sharabiani and S. M. Mousavi, “A Web-Based Decision Support System for Project Evaluation with Sustainable Development Considerations Based on Two Developed Pythagorean Fuzzy Decision Methods,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 23, p. 16477, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su152316477.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Akbar Idaman, Sengli Egani Sitepu, Tar Muhammad Raja Gungung, Iriene Putri Mulyadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
